Understanding Dismissal Options for Michigan Disorderly Conduct Charges
If you are charged in Royal Oak, Southfield, or another Oakland County jurisdiction, understanding available defenses helps clarify whether a disorderly conduct charge may be dismissed, reduced, or challenged in court. A thorough examination and challenge of the evidence can play a critical role in shaping the final resolution.
Friedman Law Firm represents clients throughout Michigan in disorderly conduct cases and works toward favorable results, including dismissals when supported by the law and the evidence. Contact our office today for a no-cost consultation and discuss your next steps.
Key Takeaways About Michigan Disorderly Conduct Cases
- Michigan disorderly conduct laws under MCL 750.167 cover a broad range of behaviors, creating opportunities for legal challenges based on vague statutory language and officer interpretation.
- Defense strategies may focus on insufficient evidence, constitutional violations, witness credibility issues, or whether the conduct is protected by the First Amendment.
- Most disorderly conduct charges are misdemeanors carrying up to 90 days in jail and $500 in fines, but felony charges exist for certain aggravated circumstances.
- A Michigan disorderly conduct lawyer identifies procedural errors, constitutional violations, and evidentiary weaknesses that prosecutors may overlook or minimize.
- Early involvement by experienced legal counsel can help preserve evidence, identify witnesses, and pursue favorable resolutions when supported by the facts and law.
Michigan Disorderly Conduct Laws Under MCL 750.167 Explained
MCL 750.167 defines disorderly conduct through a list of specific behaviors that Michigan considers disruptive to public peace and safety. The statute covers everything from public intoxication that endangers others to loitering in places where illegal activity occurs.
Michigan law identifies several categories of conduct that may result in disorderly conduct charges:
- Being intoxicated in public while endangering others or causing a public disturbance
- Engaging in indecent or obscene conduct in a public place
- Window peeping or prowling around residences without lawful purpose
- Loitering in places where prostitution or illegal occupations occur
- Engaging in brawls, fights, or violent behavior in public spaces
These examples show how broadly Michigan law defines disorderly conduct. The statute’s broad terminology gives law enforcement discretion, while also allowing defense attorneys to challenge whether the law was properly applied in a specific case.
How Vague Disorderly Conduct Statutes Create Defense Opportunities
Michigan’s disorderly conduct laws use broad language that can be unclear. Defense lawyers can use this lack of clarity to challenge charges. Terms like public disturbance, obscene conduct, and loitering are not clearly defined, which leaves room for disagreement about what behavior is actually illegal.
Courts have said that not all disruptive behavior counts as disorderly conduct. The details matter. Factors such as the situation, whether public peace was truly disturbed, and whether other responses were possible affect whether prosecutors can prove the charge.
This flexibility gives police discretion to make arrests, but it also allows defense lawyers to argue that the law was applied incorrectly. A Michigan disorderly conduct lawyer looks closely at whether the facts match what the law actually prohibits.
Common Grounds for Disorderly Conduct Charge Dismissal in Michigan

Insufficient Evidence and Witness Credibility Problems
Many disorderly conduct cases rely primarily on the arresting officer’s testimony about what they observed. When video evidence contradicts the officer’s account, when witnesses provide conflicting descriptions of events, or when the officer’s report contains inconsistencies, defense attorneys may challenge the prosecution’s case.
The prosecution must prove every element of a disorderly conduct offense beyond a reasonable doubt. If the evidence fails to show that your conduct satisfied the specific subsection charged, such as conduct that actually amounted to a public disturbance and was not protected by law, the charge may be dismissed or reduced.
Constitutional Violations in Michigan Disorderly Conduct Cases
Law enforcement must follow constitutional requirements when investigating and arresting individuals for disorderly conduct. Violations of your Fourth Amendment rights against illegal searches, Fifth Amendment protections against self-incrimination, or First Amendment speech protections may lead to dismissal.
Common constitutional issues that a Michigan disorderly conduct lawyer identifies include:
- Arrests without probable cause or reasonable suspicion of criminal activity
- Searches of your person or property without consent, warrant, or lawful exception
- Coerced statements or confessions obtained without proper Miranda warnings
- Retaliation for exercising First Amendment rights to speech or assembly
- Selective enforcement targeting individuals based on protected characteristics
When constitutional violations occur, courts may suppress illegally obtained evidence or dismiss charges entirely. The timing matters, as appropriate motions must be filed before trial to preserve these challenges.
Michigan Disorderly Conduct Penalties and Criminal Record Impact
Most disorderly conduct charges under MCL 750.167 are misdemeanors, but the penalties still carry significant consequences. Understanding what you face helps you appreciate why carefully evaluating the strength of the evidence and available defenses is often preferable to accepting a plea without full review of the case.
Standard Misdemeanor Disorderly Conduct Penalties
In Michigan, a misdemeanor disorderly conduct conviction carries up to 90 days in county jail and fines of up to $500. Courts may also impose probation, community service, drug or alcohol testing, and anger management or substance abuse counseling.
A conviction results in a permanent criminal record that can appear on background checks by employers, landlords, licensing boards, and schools, potentially affecting employment, housing, professional licenses, and security clearances.
While Michigan’s Clean Slate Act permits expungement of certain misdemeanors after three years, a dismissal avoids a criminal record and the need for expungement altogether.
Felony Disorderly Conduct for Aggravated Circumstances
While most disorderly conduct charges are misdemeanors, Michigan law creates felony penalties for specific aggravated circumstances. MCL 750.167d makes it a felony to disrupt funerals, memorial services, viewings, processions, or burials through certain conduct intended to cause disruption.
First-time felony disorderly conduct convictions carry up to two years in prison and fines up to $5,000. Subsequent convictions increase penalties to four years in prison and $10,000 in fines. These enhanced penalties make aggressive defense necessary when facing felony charges.
How a Michigan Disorderly Conduct Lawyer Defends Public Intoxication Cases
Public intoxication cases represent a significant portion of Michigan disorderly conduct charges. Many people misunderstand Michigan law on this point. Simply being intoxicated in public is not, by itself, illegal in Michigan. Charges only arise when intoxication combines with conduct that endangers others or creates public disturbances.
Defense Strategies for Public Intoxication Disorderly Conduct Charges
The distinction between legal public intoxication and criminal disorderly conduct creates defense opportunities. A Michigan disorderly conduct lawyer challenges whether your intoxicated behavior actually endangered anyone or caused a genuine disturbance beyond simply offending observers.
Prosecutors must present evidence that intoxication was accompanied by conduct that actually endangered others or caused a public disturbance. Vague claims that you appeared drunk or behaved oddly do not meet this standard.
Defense strategies used in public intoxication cases include:
- Challenging whether the officer properly observed dangerous or disturbing conduct
- Demonstrating that no actual public disturbance occurred beyond predicted concerns
- Showing your conduct fell within a range of behaviors tolerated in that location
- Questioning whether the officer’s subjective interpretation influenced their assessment
- Proving you neither endangered others nor created disturbances under the legal standard
Michigan law does not prohibit public intoxication unless it involves conduct that endangers others or causes a public disturbance. Defense attorneys focus on prosecution failures to prove those additional elements beyond reasonable doubt.
Michigan Disorderly Conduct Charges and Free Speech

Courts have repeatedly held that offensive, controversial, or profane language may be protected speech, depending on the circumstances. The government may not criminalize speech simply because it offends or disturbs others. Charges based on speech are unconstitutional unless the conduct falls within narrow, unprotected categories.
Unprotected speech is limited to true threats of violence, fighting words likely to provoke immediate violence, or speech that incites imminent lawless action. The prosecution must prove that speech fits within one of these exceptions. Political expression, verbal disputes, and offensive language generally remain protected.
When charges stem from expressive activity, defense counsel challenges whether the state may lawfully restrict the speech. Courts apply strict scrutiny to content-based restrictions, requiring a compelling government interest and narrowly tailored enforcement.
Timing and Michigan Disorderly Conduct Charges
Prompt action after an arrest helps preserve evidence and procedural rights that may affect how the case is addressed by the court. Evidence may be lost, witnesses become harder to locate, and prosecutors adopt fixed positions as time passes.
Early involvement allows defense counsel to review the evidence, assess procedural issues, and identify potential defenses at an earlier stage of the case.
Immediate Steps After a Disorderly Conduct Arrest
Avoid speaking with law enforcement or prosecutors without an attorney present. Anything you say at any point can be used against you, and having counsel handle all communication helps protect your rights.
Document the incident while details remain fresh, including what occurred, what was said, who witnessed the event, and any surrounding circumstances. Preserve text messages, social media posts, photographs, and videos connected to the incident.
Identify witnesses as soon as possible and provide their contact information to your attorney. Statements obtained early tend to be more detailed and reliable than those taken months later.
Why Legal Representation Matters
Friedman Law Firm has more than 30 years of experience in criminal defense, including representing clients in disorderly conduct cases throughout Oakland County, Wayne County, and Macomb County. The firm focuses exclusively on criminal defense and family law, allowing attorneys to assess how misdemeanor charges affect employment, housing, and family court matters.
Founder Lowell S. Friedman, a University of Detroit Mercy School of Law graduate and Super Lawyers honoree, built the firm on assertive defense strategies and individualized representation. The legal team regularly appears in district and circuit courts across metropolitan Detroit.
How a Michigan Disorderly Conduct Lawyer Defends Your Case
Effective defense begins with identifying factual and constitutional weaknesses. Attorneys examine the police encounter, charging decisions, and evidence collection.
Defense services include:
- Reviewing police reports for errors or inconsistencies
- Interviewing witnesses who may challenge the prosecution’s account
- Assessing whether the conduct is protected by the First Amendment
- Challenging evidence obtained through unlawful searches or rights violations
- Negotiating dismissals or reduced charges
- Representing clients at arraignments, hearings, and trial
Michigan disorderly conduct statutes are broadly written, and prosecutors must prove every element beyond a reasonable doubt. Friedman Law Firm represents clients from its Royal Oak office on South Main Street and offers flexible meeting options, including virtual consultations.
FAQs for Michigan Disorderly Conduct Lawyer
What qualifies as disorderly conduct in Michigan?
Under MCL 750.167, disorderly conduct can include public intoxication that causes a disturbance, indecent or obscene public behavior, window peeping, fighting, and loitering connected to illegal activity. The statute is broad and often relies on officer judgment, which can be challenged.
How long does disorderly conduct stay on your record?
A conviction stays on your criminal record unless it is expunged. Michigan’s Clean Slate Act allows expungement of certain misdemeanors after three years. A dismissal avoids a record and the need for expungement.
What defenses are used in disorderly conduct cases?
Defenses may include lack of evidence, constitutional violations, no intent to disturb the peace, conduct that does not meet the statute, or unreliable witnesses. The right defense depends on the facts of the case.
What happens at a disorderly conduct arraignment?
The court reads the charge and you enter a plea. A not guilty plea allows your lawyer to review evidence, challenge the charge, and negotiate with prosecutors. Do not plead guilty without legal advice.
How much does a Michigan disorderly conduct lawyer cost?
Fees depend on the facts of the case and how far it proceeds. Friedman Law Firm offers free consultations and payment options. Legal representation often costs less than the long-term impact of a conviction.
Contact a Michigan Disorderly Conduct Lawyer to Fight Your Charges

Do not let a misunderstanding or an officer’s interpretation damage your future. Friedman Law Firm has represented clients throughout Michigan in fighting disorderly conduct charges and seeking dismissals or other favorable resolutions when supported by the facts and law.
Call us today for a no-cost consultation with a skilled Michigan disorderly conduct lawyer.